Kaloko vs Loom videos and screenshots
Recording a walkthrough or pasting screenshots into Slack is how most teams show work today. It is fast to make and hard to review: nobody can find screen 14 in German, nobody knows who approved it, and the next build makes it stale.
Side by side
| Kaloko | Video and screenshots | |
|---|---|---|
| Format | A canvas: each step in each language and screen size, with criteria | A linear video, or loose images in a thread or a PDF |
| Finding one screen | A link to the step and criterion | Scrubbing the video or scrolling the thread |
| Comments | Pinned to the screenshot, in threads the agent reads and answers | Timestamps under the video, replies in chat |
| Approval | A stamp with a name, a run verdict and history | A reaction emoji, if anyone remembers |
| After the next build | Walk again; compare shows what moved | Record or screenshot everything again |
| Checks | Countable criteria verified with evidence | None |
| Who makes it | The agent, as part of the task | A person, after the work |
- You want to explain your reasoning with your voice and face.
- It is a one-off demo nobody needs to approve.
- The audience needs a story more than a record.
- Someone has to approve the work, screen by screen.
- The same flow exists in several languages and screen sizes.
- Feedback has to reach the agent that fixes it.
When to use both
Record the story when it helps; link the canvas for the decision.
Independent of host, agent and AI vendor
Kaloko walks any address, works with any coding agent through the same skill, MCP server and CLI, and its semantic evaluator is replaceable: hosted by us or with your own key. The record of who approved what stays in one place, exportable, whichever tools you change.
Facts about other products as of 30 September 2026, from their public pages; they change often. Tell us if something is out of date: support@sinfin.cz.
Try Kaloko on your next task
Free plan, free for good · e-mail sign-in · the first run in ten minutes